Sunday, February 10, 2013

THE FORESKIN MAFIA.

THE FORESKIN MAFIA.



The humble foreskin has long been the source of much controversy and continues today particularly in North America to generate even more unbelievable controversy.
The most disturbing and alarming is in the unethical trafficking of neonate foreskins.

Not only do parents of North American baby boys have to pay between $200 to $300 to obstetricians to circumcise their boys that no sooner are the circumcised foreskins cut off that they are sold on to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies by the hospitals.
The numbers of dollars involved are bewilderingly staggering, and this financial force is one which is providing the funds to continue the spread of medical propaganda advocating circumcision.


The resale value of neonate foreskins is astronomically dizzying in that from one boy’s foreskin can be grown bio-engineered skin in a lab to the size of a football field.
That’s 4 acres of new skin or around 200,000 units of manufactured skin, which is enough skin to cover about 250 people and sells at $3,000 a square foot.

Considering that there are 1.25 million neonate foreskins circumcised each year in the U.S alone this translates to one of the most lucrative trades, if not THE most lucrative trade in human body parts ever in the history of humanity.
The justifiable explanations are that this newly bio-engineered skin is used for burns, persistent leg ulcers, bed sores, reconstructive surgery and other skin problems.
Companies such as Advanced Tissue Sciences, BioSurface Technologies, Genzyme, Ortec International, and Organogenisis (and many others) are huge purchasers of infant foreskin tissue.
The latest wonder in medical technology, Organogenesis's Apligraf is the first and only human skin construct with FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approval.

Closing wounds is what skin constructs do best thus Bio-engineering researchers want to switch to skin constructs for some of their testing.
No one's sure how these constructs work, but the statistics are incredible. Made of newborn penis-wraps (neonatal foreskin) and cow fat (bovine collagen), Apligraf placed over pernicious wounds magically heals the treated area.
Almost 50 percent more wounds heal with Apligraf than with compression alone.

The following is a description of what Apligraf is from their website...
"Apligraf is a unique biological product, containing living cells and structural (rebuilding) proteins and growth factors similar to healthy human skin. Because it is biological, the body can use the elements in Apligraf to help repair itself.
As a result, Apligraf is natural and well tolerated, with no major reported side effects.”


Not surprisingly, nowhere on this website is it mentioned that neonate foreskins are used for this product, preferring to say that the product contains “living cells” or that it’s a “biological” product.
Theories abound as to why newborn foreskins work so well.

According to the most accepted theory, newborn skin cells can morph into any kind of skin cell, whereas adult skin cells perform a specific function, which is why skin grafting is problematic.
Also, neonatal tissue hasn’t yet developed the immunity proteins that cause rejection with adult human skin.

Human skin constructs certainly put a spin on the circumcision debate. Previously, parents had only weak evidence of the health benefits of circumcision, such as a lower risk of infection.

Now, circumcision really does have health benefits, only it’s not the baby boys who are losing parts of their penises who benefit.

Circumcision is a multi billion dollar industry in North America and one doctor alone in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia claims having performed 20,000 circumcisions over the past decade, charging around $250 per procedure, which has earned this doctor an unbelievable $5 million.

It is estimated that between the surgery and the foreskin's resale value, each foreskin is worth approximately $100,000.   
The number crunchers estimate the developed world's market for human-skin constructs is somewhere between $1 billion and $2 billion for the treatment of burns alone; for the treatment of chronic wounds (diabetic ulcers, pressure sores, and venous ulcers), the market is roughly $10 billion.

Advanced Tissue's flagship skin-construct, Dermagraft (described on their website as “manufactured from human fibroblast cells derived from newborn foreskin tissue”), sells for $3,000 per square foot, harvesting 250,000 square feet of Dermagraft from one foreskin alone.


The math translates theoretically into a $750,000,000 transaction, which is astounding, outrageous and atrociously sickening….Is it not?
Foreskin Mafia indeed!


This is the sort of information that everyone, especially all North Americans MUST know about to curtail and ultimately stop this outrageous scam for once and for all.






~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
http://www.acroposthion.com/acroposthion_018.htm  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.


Saturday, February 9, 2013

HOW COULD ANY PARENT LET THIS HAPPEN!

How could any loving and caring parent allow this to happen to their newborn son?


Some get a chocolate bar for their life sentence....!!!




A bucket of severed foreskins!!!





UNCIRCUMCISED PENIS - LARGER.


Men who have not been circumcised typically have larger penises than men who have been circumcised.

 

What is the reason for this?

 
Circumcision is a surgical process usually performed when the male is in his infancy.
 
It removes the foreskin from his penis.
 
It is a traumatic process for the infant and some researchers believe that it creates deep-based psychological fears, as the male is so young.
 
When the foreskin is surgically removed it creates scarring and scar tissue.
 
If a circumcised male looks at his penis he can usually see the scarring between the shaft of the penis where it meets the corona (the corona is at the base or back of the head of the penis).
 
The scarring is usually visible because the skin will have a different color than the rest of the penis.
 
This scarring damages the tissues in this area of the penis and will impede penis length on erection.
 
Because this is done in infancy (usually) and before puberty, this will affect the size of the penis when it gets its growth spurt during adolescence.
 
AN AUSTRALIAN SCIENTIFIC STUDY
MEASURED 158 MEN FOR PENIS LENGTH.
 
THEY COMPARED CIRCUMCISED AND UNCIRCUMCISED MEN.
 
They found that the average penis length in circumcised men was 5% less than non-circumcised men.
 
This, of course, is the average. Some men lost less and some men lost more of their size.
 
It's also worth noting the research of Dr. John Taylor who revealed that 51% of an infant's penile skin is removed with circumcision.
 
But affecting penis size isn't the only problem with circumcision.
 
The foreskin is rich in sensory nerve endings and is one of the main areas of the penis that increases a man's sexual pleasure.
 
When it is removed this decreases the sexual pleasure a man will feel during intercourse.
 
The foreskin is also rich in tactile nerve endings, like those found in the fingertips that can perceive very fine sensations through feeling.
 
With removal of the foreskin, the male loses this very fine touch sensation in his penis. This is important because he won't be able to "feel" the vagina with his penis.
 
The scarring of the penis cannot be reversed, unfortunately, but there are methods of natural penis enlargement that can help increase a man's size if he was robbed of it through this surgical procedure.
 
There are also methods of increasing the sensitivity and sensation-ability of the penis.

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooOoo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooOoo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

PHIMOSIS.

PHIMOSIS.


 

What is Phimosis?

Pronounced ‘Fi-Moze-Is” is a state in which the male foreskin is unable
to retract properly from the head of the penis (or glans).

This is due to an unusually tight foreskin.

The causes of a tight foreskin can vary, but most commonly it is simply
because males are born with it that way.

Usually the condition resolves as the male develops into adult-hood.

However, a proportion of men can have phimosis persist into later years,
with a spectrum of presentations.

Also, over time it can also be exacerbated by tearing of the opening
of the foreskin, which leaves little scars.

This can leave a fairly right rim of scar tissue. Incidence of Phimosis varies,
but it is thought to be as high as 1-5% of the male non-circumcised population.

The absolute incidence is much higher in Japan, which has never had a
cultural practice of circumcision.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM OF MALE CIRCUMCISION.

The Psychological Harm of Male Circumcision. 
           (Kurt Johmann Written: August 2003)





To get a quick sense of this essay’s content, its sections are:
 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oOo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oOo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

.

CIRCUMCISION ANALOGY.

If you cut the aerial lead to your television, you will still get a very limited reception...
If you cut off the foreskin (consisting of thousands of nerve endings) the brain still copes but on a limited supply.
'Sex' happens in the brain; the genitalia is just the 'organ' for sex.
A quote from a 'Intact America' member made this analogy -"Intact males have orgasms in full technicolour; mutilated males have theirs in black-and-white."
 
He also added that a British tourist to the U.S. commented on the number of outlets selling sexual lubricants (which is necessary for circumcised males and their partners.)
A survey found that two-thirds of circumcised males experienced some pain during masturbation; one third experienced quite intense pain.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thursday, October 29, 2009

THE FORESKIN.

The Foreskin.

 

...also called the prepuce [Latin: prae = in front & putium = penis] is the protective sheath of penile skin, which covers the head of the penis, otherwise called the glans [Greek: balanos = acorn & Latin: (pl) glandes (pen[i]um) = acorn (of the penis)].

 
The skin of the penis is continuous, forming a cylindrical double layer of tissue consisting of the outer foreskin tapering at the acroposthion, which inverts into itself becoming the inner foreskin.

Upon erection it may retract and unroll of itself into a single layered cylinder, but not necessarily and can be retracted manually.

Some foreskins however are tight, retracting with difficulty and some foreskins don’t retract at all.

This condition called Phimosis [Greek: muzzling] is the natural state for neonates (new born) and boys.

The synechia, also known as the balano-preputial membrane or the
balano-preputial lamina is the membrane that attaches the inner surface
of the foreskin to the glans. 
 
A Danish study found that 50% of foreskins became retractable (desquamation) before 10 years of age and 99% of foreskins were retractable by the end of puberty through the vigorous erections of adolescence, helped by masturbation.

Therefore the foreskin should be left alone whilst a boy is growing up and should not be forcefully retracted for any reason whatsoever, because it may tear or harm the penis in some way.

The only person to retract a child's foreskin should be the child himself, when he has discovered that his foreskin is ready to retract.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.

Friday, May 1, 2009

MALE FEELINGS.

MALE FEELINGS.


Listen carefully to what men have to say about their own circumcisions.
These are direct quotes, compiled by John Erickson and Jeffrey Wood.

I think I could have accepted a deformity that was an accident of nature,
but I can't accept that someone did this to me.

My feelings about the doctor who circumcised me are too violent to describe.

I have never been able to accept the fact that when I was a baby someone cut part of my penis off. The sheer monstrousness of it haunts every waking moment of my life.

Sometimes I'm beginning to make some sort of adjustment to it, but then I see an unmutilated man in a shower or magazine and I become overwhelmed by uncontrollable feelings of outrage and disbelief that I was made the victim for life of something so sick.

There's something very wrong and very frightening about a society that systematically tortures and mutilates babies.

I am Jewish and I hate the tradition that robbed me of my best part.

I was circumcised when I was five, seventy years ago.
I felt rage then and I still feel rage now. 
The worst thing about circumcision is that it produces circumcisers.

I wish I could circumcise every uncircumcised man in the world, so they'd all be like me.  I don't have a foreskin and no one else should have one either.

Butchers!

I was circumcised by force when a child, and it has ruined my entire life as far as I'm concerned.

Fear, pain, crippling, disfigurement and humiliation are the classic ways to break the human spirit.    
Circumcision includes them all!

 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

HORROR STORIES.

Horror Stories.


Living with the Effects of Circumcision –
Circumcision Surgery Accidents, Complications, and Atrocities...

----------------------------------------------- ooo ----------------------------------------------

http://www.fathermag.com/health/circ/horror/horror.shtml 

----------------------------------------------- ooo ----------------------------------------------

.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

THE TREATMENT OF PHIMOSIS.

THE TREATMENT OF PHIMOSIS

WITH TOPICAL STEROID.


[AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY (MELBOURNE) Volume 64, Number 5: Pages 327-328,May 1994.]


A prospective study of the efficacy of topical steroid in the treatment of childhood phimosis is reported.

Boys referred to a paediatric surgical practice with pathological non-retractable foreskins were treated with topical (surface) beta methasone cream.
[Applied twice daily - for four to six weeks.]

One hundred and thirty-patients were treated and 111 completed the study.
 
A satisfactory result, defined as foreskin retractability appropriate for the boys' age, was achieved in 80% of patients.

In 10% the response was inadequate at the end of the study period, but these boys were still under treatment or surveillance because their parents declined circumcision.

In 10%, circumcision was performed because of failure of treatment.

In six patients this was due to balantis xerotica obliterans (lichen sclerosus 
et atrophicus) which does not respond to conservative treatment.

Successful treatment depends upon the presence of a normal supple foreskin
at the outset, and on parental compliance.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
.

Blog Archive