Sunday, February 17, 2013

PRO-MUTILATION LOBBY.

PRO-MUTILATION LOBBY.



'Turning 180-degrees to the Pro-Mutilation BlogSpot'

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 

CRAZY DUTCH WANT TO BAN MALE CIRCUMCISION.

At a time when much of the world is embracing the life-saving and
healthy practice of male circumcision, Radio Netherlands is reporting
that the Royal Dutch Medical Society wants to ban all male
circumcisions in that country.

What's wrong with these Dutch doctors?

What studies have they failed to read?
What recommendations of the World Health Organization do they reject?
What makes them incapable of seeing the benefits of a clean-cut penis?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
***The following is a 'Clayton's Circumcision' -
'The circumcision you have when you are not having a circumcision!
'
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

U.S. Pediatrician Group Okays "Minor Circumcision" of Girls.


Anti-circumcision fanatics have long argued that if female circumcision
is outlawed, then male circumcision should be, too. 

Of course, this argument assumes that both types of circumcision are the
same - which they are clearly not.

Female circumcision has never been proven to offer any health advantage
to the circumcised girl. 

It is solely a cultural tradition embraced by many around the world. 

In contrast, in one medical study after another, male circumcision
offers positive benefits to the male and his partners. 

That should end the discussion, but it never does with the anti-circs.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.

No comments:

Blog Archive